No items found.
You are viewing the staging site, links to this site not to be shared publicly, use:
Production link

Nitrogen 2.0

The Next Generation of Nitrogen Management in Food Production Systems

Vision Statement

Nitrogen (N) is an essential element for all living organisms. Its use in agriculture is key to nourishing a growing human population. However, only about 50% of the N added to croplands is recovered in harvested crop products, most of which is fed to livestock and poultry, and only about 16% ends up in crop and animal products for human consumption. Overall, the use of synthetic N fertilizers has been a tremendous boon for human nutrition and health, but the inefficiencies in food production systems have led to losses of N to water and air, leading to numerous unsustainable environmental and human health impacts, including significant contributions to climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, drinking water contamination, harmful algal blooms, and respiratory illnesses.

Current efforts to improve N efficiency in agriculture focus largely on the “4R” concept of nutrient stewardship -- application of nutrients with the right rate, right type, right time, and right placement. Expansion of a variety of best management practices, such as adopting enhanced efficiency fertilizers, conservation tillage, cover crops, and improved irrigation management, can also improve N use efficiency. These approaches and other on-going innovations are making important incremental contributions to reducing N pollution in air and water, but they face challenges of variable effectiveness by locale, socio-economic barriers to widespread adoption, and lack of a more comprehensive systems approach to decoupling food production from nitrogen losses to the environment.

We envision a transformation of the current, mostly linear and “leaky” system of N use in agriculture to one that is more circular, targeted, and efficient, thus cutting polluting N losses by half while also ensuring the high productivity needed to meet growing human needs for healthy diets and food security.  Emanating from an interdisciplinary workshop of thirty eminent agronomists, geneticists, soil scientists, livestock specialists, biogeochemists, biotechnologists, economists, ecologists, and modelers (see list below), held at the Banbury Center of the Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory in April 2024, we call this new vision Nitrogen2.0.

For most of human history, farmers relied on natural sources of N to grow crops, such as the natural soil fertility and manure additions, which we call Nitrogen0.0. As populations rose in the 19th century, this system was inadequate to meet food demands. Early 20th century discoveries led to Nitrogen1.0– large-scale production of synthetic N fertilizers, which revolutionized agriculture and greatly improved human nutrition and food security. However, this has led to unsustainable N losses to air as ammonia, nitrogen oxides, and nitrous oxide and to water as nitrate and dissolved organic nitrogen. Specialization and intensification of agriculture led to separation of crop and animal production, uncoupling manure production from recycling and leading to more nitrogen losses. Consequently, two-thirds of U.S. coastal ecosystems, one-third of streams, and two-fifths of lakes are impaired by nitrogen and phosphorus pollution; 1.4 million people rely on well water in areas where groundwater nitrate concentrations exceed drinking water standards; and over 100,000 premature deaths are attributed annually to air pollution from nitrogen oxides, ammonia, and fine particulates. Nitrous oxide, emitted mostly from agricultural soils, contributes 6% of global radiative forcing and is the most abundantly emitted stratospheric ozone depleting substance. Mitigating these impacts while maintaining agricultural productivity remains a significant challenge for the 21st century.

Enter Nitrogen2.0 – a new era of N management that is more circular, targeted, and efficient, thus enabling high productivity while significantly reducing environmental impacts. This re-imagining of the crop and livestock systems through technological development and management innovation could cut N losses to air and water by half while maintaining the productivity needed for human nutrition and food security. Increased fertilizer use efficiency can also reduce costs and improve profits.

The Nitrogen2.0 vision has three main pillars of innovation:

  1. Considerable efficiency can be gained by “skipping” a trophic level – in other words, feed more N directly to the animals rather than fertilizing crops with N and feeding the crops to the animals. Livestock will still need some crop-based feed, but animal feed will include larger fractions of N additions, such as supplemental amino acids, urea, nitrate, microbial biomass designed for animal feed, silage further enriched in N during fermentation, and novel crops such as aquatic plants that remove N from agricultural runoff or wastewater. Increased use of traditional and novel forms of non-crop-N fed directly to animals will reduce the dependence on crop production. As the demand for crude protein from crops declines, much of the current leakage of N pollution to air and water that accompanies fertilized crop production will also decline. Targeting N additions directly to animal feed in place of traditional crop-derived N would also offer greater opportunities to manage the animals’ nutritional needs more precisely. Complementary proteins may also be developed for direct human consumption, although a longer time horizon may be needed to modify human dietary options.
  2. Crop breeding offers several opportunities for improving nitrogen efficiencies on croplands. Changes in animal feed options described above will create new possibilities for breeding crops with lower N and thus less fertilizer demand. For example, with less demand for N in crop-based crude protein for feed, corn can be bred for low N content in the grain for use in other products, including biofuels. Crop breeding can also improve within-cropland N recycling through a number of strategies that mimic perennial systems, such as cold tolerance for longer growing seasons and recycling of N to roots in the autumn. With less demand for N-rich crops as animal feed, the spared cropland could be used for other purposes, such as specialty crops meant for direct human consumption, increased biofuel production, or expansion of conservation lands.
  3. Nitrogen2.0 also envisions large improvements in manure-N capture and recycling onto croplands, thus recoupling animal-crop N cycling at scales befitting modern agricultural supply chains. Greater circularity of nutrient dynamics and application of technologies that recover and more efficiently re-use animal N resources will decrease demand for inputs of synthetic N fertilizers and reduce N pollution. Animal breeding may also allow a broader range of N sources in feed as well as manure characteristics that enable improved manure management, recycling, and energy production. Recovery of human wastes for uses such as energy, fertilizer, or feed production may also be improved, although this may require longer-term R&D. This list of technologies, supply chain adjustments, and governing policies is likely to grow and evolve with time and experience.

These three components—increased non-crop-N in livestock feed, improved efficiencies through crop breeding and management, and improved manure management and recycling—will each make major contributions to reduce N losses on their own, and they synergize to advance a more sustainable and circular food production system. The Nitrogen2.0 transformative vision is consistent with, but goes well beyond, currently available measures to improved nitrogen management, such as implementation of the “4Rs” of nutrient stewardship (application of nutrients with the right rate, right type, right time, and right placement), enhanced efficiency fertilizers, other soil amendments, conservation tillage, cover crops, and other concepts of regenerative agriculture. It is not mutually exclusive with other possible technological breakthroughs, such as genetic modification for biological N fixation in grains or development of high yielding perennial crops. Nor does it preclude or depend upon an uncertain social acceptance of large-scale dietary changes. Rather, Nitrogen2.0 focuses on transformational changes that could be achieved within the next few decades with appropriate R&D investments to substantially improve targeted efficiencies and circularities. Research initiatives on improving animal feed management, crop breeding, and manureshed management are already underway, but they need to be accelerated and linked in a systems approach in order to achieve the transformational potential of Nitrogen2.0. It will require collaboration across disciplines, as exemplified by the participation of the Banbury workshop experts who are launching this vision. Nitrogen2.0 is compatible with other efforts to advance regenerative agriculture or to encourage more plant-based diets, but it focuses primarily on targeted efficiencies and circularity of N use. Achieving the full potential of the Nitrogen2.0 vision may require decades of R&D and scaling-up, but it is grounded in strong existing science and practical experience that can form the basis for action now.

Nitrogen2.0 Steering Committee

  • Lisa Ainsworth, USDA-ARS, University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign
  • Maya Almaraz, Yale University
  • Karl Anderson, Supporters of Agricultural Research (SoAR) Foundation
  • Charles Brooke, Spark Climate Solutions
  • Ed Buckler, USDA-ARS, Cornell University
  • Eric Davidson, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Spark Climate Solutions
  • Sheri Spiegal, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range
  • Xin Zhang, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

Banbury Workshop Participants

(funded by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Corporate Sponsor Program)

  • Maya Almaraz, Associate Research Scientist, Yale School of the Environment
  • Karl Anderson, President, Supporters of Agricultural Research Foundation
  • Bruno Basso, Hannah Distinguished Professor, Michigan State University
  • Mark Boggess, Director, USDA-ARS US Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC)
  • Charles Brooke, Program Lead, Enteric Methane, Spark Climate Solutions
  • Jasmine Bruno, Scientific Program Director, Foundation for Food & Agriculture Research (FFAR)
  • Ed Buckler, USDA-ARS Research Geneticist, USDA-ARS; and Adjunct Professor of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University
  • Mike Castellano, Professor, Department of Agronomy, Plant Sciences Institute
  • Eric Davidson, Professor, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science; and Principal Scientist, Spark Climate Solutions
  • Jennifer Dunn, Professor, Chemical and Biological Engineering and Director, Trienens Institute for Sustainability and Energy
  • Emily Geoghegan, Ph.D. Candidate, Cornell University
  • Alexander Hristov, Distinguished Professor, Penn State University
  • Alex Huddell, Assistant Professor of Agroecology/Sustainable Crop Production Systems, University of Delaware
  • Virginia Jin, Supervisory Research Soil Scientist, USDA Agricultural Research Service
  • Sung Woo Kim, WNR Distinguished Professor, North Carolina State University
  • Peter Kleinman, Research Leader and Soil Scientist, USDA Agricultural Research Service
  • German Mandrini, Agricultural Data Scientist, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • Rob Martienssen, William J Matheson Professor and HHMI Investigator, Program Chair in Genomics and PlantBiology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • Rebecca McGee, Research Geneticist, USDA ARS; and Adjunct Professor, Washington State University
  • Dan Northrup, Affiliate Associate Professor, Iowa State University; and Principal of Science and Technology, Galvanize Climate Solutions
  • Sara Place, Associate Professor, AgNext and Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University
  • Paul Reginato, Cofounder and Science Director, Homeworld Collective
  • Sheri Spiegal, Rangeland Management Specialist, USDA Agricultural Research Service
  • Steven Singer, Program Director, ARPA-E
  • Whendee Silver, Distinguished Professor of Ecosystem Ecology and Biogeochemistry, University of California, Berkeley
  • Ying Sun, Associate Professor, Cornell University
  • Doreen Ware, Plant Molecular & Computational Biologist, USDA-ARS NEA; and Adjunct Professor, Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory
  • Wendy Yang, Professor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Xin Zhang, Associate Professor, University of Maryland; and Director, Global Nitrogen Innovation Center for Clean Energy and the Environment

Stay in touch

Sign up to our Spark newsletter and stay updated!

Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Methane Removal Community Newsletter signup